LAGUNA BEACH CITY COUNCIL WRAP-UP
- Share via
The following is from the Laguna Beach City Council meeting of April 3:
PUBLIC COMMENT
“We feel it is only right that, if the city is going to approve a project, the city has a duty to mitigate the problems,” Middlebrook said.
She submitted a protocol for the construction site and asked the council to endorse it.
Her proposal included sanctions for parking violations, with the revenue used to fund the monitor; no construction vehicles before 7:30 a.m.; no idling or dieseling on neighborhood streets; site rules to be printed in English and Spanish and posted; names and contact numbers of the developer and contractor to be posted on each site, with the developer taking responsibility for workers’ conduct; changes in work schedule to be posted 48 hours in advance.
Mayor Toni Iseman added the impact of sequential projects to Middlebrook’s proposal and asked that the item be put on the May 17 agenda.
Mayor Pro Tem Jane Egly suggested expanding the item to include any neighborhood where construction is occurring.
COUNCIL/STAFF CHAT
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved without comment:
Pulled for discussion:
COASTAL CITIES ISSUES GROUP 5-0
The council designated Iseman as the city’s representative to the Coastal Cities Issues Group and Egly as the alternate.
The group was formed to identify problems facing coastal cities and to develop ways to address and remedy them.
“This is a very active group, very passionate,” said Egly, who attended the fist meeting with Assistant City Manager John Pietig.
Egly recommended participation.
Iseman said her experience as a former member of the California Coastal Commission would make her a valuable representative for the city.
CEQA HANDBOOK UPDATE 5-0
The council adopted a resolution enacting procedures for implementing the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the state CEQA guidelines as part of the local procedures.
The Planning Commission, the city’s Environmental Committee and staff were instructed to develop significant local environmental thresholds and a CEQA Process public information handout, as suggested by the commission in the joint meeting with the council on March 26.
BOARD AND CARE 5-0
The council unanimously voted to direct staff to send letters supporting state legislation that gives local governments more say in residential care facilities. Cities have no say in board and care homes with six or less beds.
Staff was authorized to spend up to $2,600 from the council’s budget to join a coalition of cities considering the impacts of these facilities on communities.
REDEMPTION 5-0
The city manager was instructed to contact dealers who are required to redeem containers to ensure they are complying with state law.
LIGHTS OUT 2-3
The council voted down a proposal to direct the city manager to include in the budget deliberations a proposal to retain a consultant to analyze the city’s street lights ownership options.
The options included leaving the ownership, maintenance and replacement in the hands of Southern California Edison or claiming city ownership of the lights but continuing to buy the electricity and assuming the maintenance and replacement costs. Boyd, Schneider and Kinsman voted against the proposal initiated by Iseman.
ELECTRICAL AUDIT 5-0
The council agreed to Iseman’s proposal to direct the city manager to work with Edison to review the city’s use of electricity to see where there might be energy savings, the possibility of a rebate, and to determine the cost of a state Energy Commission audit. An audit proposal is to be submitted to the council during budget deliberations.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.