Alternative plan for El Morro? No way...
- Share via
Alternative plan for El Morro? No way
I have lived in Laguna Beach for 40 years and am a retired school
teacher who taught in the Laguna Beach Unified School District.
The “Alternative Plan for the El Morro Village Trailer Park” that
Steve Dicterow intends to put on the City Council agenda leaves me
gasping in incredulity.
California taxpayers bought the land for Crystal Cove State Park
from the Irvine Company in 1979 for $30 million. The trailer park is
on state-leased land, which the trailer owners have always known. Now
the state has bond funds and plans to at last transform that area
into a campground for all the world to use.
The trailer folks have come up with a list of absurd and
unrealistic proposals, but one of the most egregious is the
implication that anyone in a recreational vehicle is a predator of
some sort. This is scare/fear propaganda. Hitler and Goebbels
convinced the Germans in 1935 that Jews were evil and should be
eradicated. Hence the Holocaust! An extreme example certainly, but
fear and innuendo are powerful forces. Don’t be duped by fear
tactics. The Concordia Elementary School in San Clemente has existed
next to a state campground for 38 years. There have been zero
incidents!
It costs big dollars now to stay near the ocean in Laguna Beach. A
room at the Montage is $550 per night. A night at the El Morro
Campground would cost $24.
It’s time for the renters to leave after 23 years and open the
park to, not only Californians, but citizens everywhere.
PAM STRAYER
Laguna Beach
I am appalled that our City Council is even considering to put the
trailer park’s latest plan on the agenda!
For more than 25 years, the residents have lived on state owned
property, paying a small fraction of the rent. How can they possibly
be serious about building senior- or low-cost housing on state
property? How can they think that the greenbelt would think of
accepting any money from them?
The public has been waiting for that land to be returned to them
for too long. It is time at last to let the Park Service fulfill its
obligation to the citizens of California. The relocation benefit
given to the residents 20 years ago is over. This was given to them
in lieu of any cash payment mandated by the state and they opted for
the 20 years.
For how long should California citizens be cheated? Their
contention that a campsite near a school is dangerous has been proven
wrong by the example of the campground next to the elementary school
in San Clemente. Interestingly, the low-cost housing near the school
has been the entity that has caused some recent troubles!
CAROL MAXWELL
Laguna Beach
In councilwoman’s own defense ...
At a recent City Council meeting, Mayor Toni Iseman chose to
distribute a document to the audience, including the media -- and to
give a PowerPoint presentation, which was viewed by Laguna TV viewers
-- depicting that I had received a campaign contribution in the last
City Council election that exceeded what is allowed by law in Laguna
Beach. (The maximum contribution a candidate can receive from any
individual or entity is $250.)
After personally reviewing my campaign reports -- and having the
city clerk, the keeper of the records of our city, do the same -- it
was re-verified that I had not taken more than $250 from any
individual or entity -- and that I had not broken the city’s campaign
laws in the last City Council election.
I whole-heartedly support full disclosure re: our campaign laws,
contributors and political action committees -- and am in no way
ashamed of anyone, any entity or any PAC that contributed to my
campaigns. Anyone who knows me well knows I have a mind of my own and
that my vote cannot be “bought” -- and I believe that all the other
Laguna Beach City Council members have that same strength of
character.
However, I took this particular charge from the mayor as an attack
on my integrity. This letter should clear the record for the public
and put the matter to rest.
ELIZABETH PEARSON
City Councilwoman
Laguna Beach
More details about campaign spending
State law requires the filing of Form 460 with various schedules
for candidates to disclose political campaign contributions and
expenditures.
The idea is that the voter should know who is financially
supporting a candidate.
Many feel that campaign spending is out of control with George W.
Bush and Al Gore spending about $300 million in the last presidential
election.
However, between them they received about 100-million votes so
they paid about $3 per vote. It’s quite something that Bush and Gore
are pikers compared to the spending recently used to get elected to
the Laguna Beach City Council!
I am kind of involved in local politics, but I did not know that
Councilwoman Cheryl Kinsman, elected three years ago in 2000,
contributed $20,000 of her own money to her campaign. I am still
unable to process this information, not knowing whether to be
appalled or impressed.
While many candidates pledged to limit their campaigns to $30,000,
the Kinsman campaign, including the $20,000 of her own money totaled
$53,896.
An additional $10,925 was spent on her behalf, independent
expenditures, resulting in a total of $64,821 being spent. Receiving
4,253 votes, this is spending $14.06 per vote.
Analysis of Cheryl Kinsman’s legally required disclosure statement
shows that 33.4% of her contributions came from outside of the city
of Laguna Beach and that small donations, that is less than $100,
amounted to only 12.8% of the total.
Councilwoman Elizabeth Pearson ran both in 2000 and in 2002
spending a total of $79,074. Receiving a total of 8,126 votes in the two elections, this is spending $9.73 per vote.
Analysis of Elizabeth Pearson’s legally required 2002 disclosure
statement shows that 33% of her contributions came from outside of
the city of Laguna Beach and that small donations, that is less than
$100, amounted to only 8.9% of the total.
Perhaps there should be no limit on campaign contributions and
spending, but, in the information age, the campaign disclosures
should occur promptly and before the election. The city should
purchase such a computer program and require its use. In addition,
contributors should have to disclose their relationship with the
city, and if they directly or indirectly have any financial interest.
GENE FELDER
Laguna Beach
City Council watchers cry ‘Uncle!’
Re: Laguna Beach May 6 City Council meeting.
“Politics is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and
schizophrenia.” George Orwell
“Uncle!” OK, Laguna Beach City Council, we give up.
We, the public, must be abusing your valuable hours and we beg
forgiveness. You be the unscrupulous bobbleheads and we’ll try to not
confuse or clog your meetings with our proletarian concerns or
issues. We are not worthy, oh wise ones. You are gods and we are just
working-class slobs with mundane jobs beneath your dignity to
acknowledge. Funny, we thought you were the servants when we voted
you into office. Confess: All of that campaign trail seduction about
citizen empowerment was hollow rhetoric, now wasn’t it?
Realistically, maybe we should promise to never come back to your
council meetings to have our time wasted by self-centered elected
officials. It’s obvious that personal political agendas are being
placed upon the formal hearing dockets so these twits can vengefully
play Laguna’s version of the “Hatfields versus McCoys.”
Agendizing political action committee and campaign financing was
bad enough. Placing them in the first thirdof the lengthy calendar
beginning at 6 p.m. assured attendees and live TV watchers that the
words “interminable” and “ad nauseum” would be redefined.
While the council flailed away at each other and public speakers
in a veritable vacuum of intelligent dialogue, the clock kept ticking
for the remaining 11 agenda items. Selfishly inconsiderate they
staggered to the finish line, which took place at around 2:45 a.m.
Wednesday for those insomniacs still awake and not driven to insanity
or a comatose state.
Political action committees and campaign financing came up during
prime time, from 9 to 11 p.m., specially reserved for the Four Horse
people of the Apocalypse (Wayne Baglin, Cheryl Kinsman, Elizabeth
Pearson and Toni Iseman) to display complete ineptitude and remove
voter’s respect. Anyone who remembers Dustin Hoffman having holes
drilled in his teeth without anesthetic by Lawrence Olivier in the
movie “Marathon Man” could relate.
While most raised around $30,000 or more, we did learn that
Kinsman took in almost $65,000 ( 1/3 from out-of-towners) during her
campaign in 2000. Observing her snide remarks and Gestapo-like
mannerisms Tuesday evening, most was probably spent on rubber hoses
and Sodium Pentothal to pry the truth out of the likes of Village
Laguna elderly board members. But let’s not quibble, there was enough
shame and disgrace there for all four to gleefully share as they
arrogantly eschewed the people who entrusted them.
While running, these same angels swore off negative campaigning,
no dirty fighting or smear tactics allowed. Now seated, we’re
watching a version of fear and loathing in Laguna Beach. More than
250 years ago, King Frederick II of Prussia said: “Politics and
villainy are synonymous terms.” So start thinking of 2004 --
Collecting $30,000 to $65,000 shouldn’t be very difficult in a city
where everything, including dignified and responsive government,
seems priced for sale.
ROGER VON BUTOW
Clean Water Now! Coalition
Laguna Beach
Plenty of accolades to go around
We are much indebted to Harry Lawrence and the Laguna Beach
Chamber of Commerce Beautification Committee for the many
accomplishments they have achieved over the last 50 years, but not
all the accomplishments mentioned in Harry’s letter to the editor can
be accredited to this committee. Much on that list was spearheaded by
Village Laguna and there were other vital accomplishments not
mentioned such as the creation of the Laguna Greenbelt. However,
there should be ample recognition and congratulations to go around.
The point of my previous letter to the editor was that the city
government failed to participate in a significant way in having a
vision for Laguna Beach. The vision came from individual citizens who
banded together in different groups, grass-roots and otherwise. Some
of these groups had different views but nonetheless, and sometimes in
spite of, Laguna has been able to preserve and maintain its unique
character into the 21st Century.
We are all looking toward the current City Council to provide the
leadership to support and effectively move forward the recent
visioning process, where hundreds of Lagunans have already donated
thousands of hours. I hope the City Council does not squander all the
wonderful volunteer effort.
JOHANNA FELDER
Laguna Beach
There seems to be a lot of controversy these days about some of
Laguna’s history and who did what and when. Harry Lawrence’s recent
piece shed some light on some significant parts of that history and
his effort should be applauded. Having been personally involved in a
fair amount of Laguna’s history over the past 45years I thought I
might be of help to clarify a few of those instances.
For years, during the 1950s and 60s, many in Laguna wanted to
clean up the mess that was what is now the Main Beach Park but two
attempts to pass bond issues to fund the effort failed to win
citizens approval. Finally in the late 60s I rallied most of Laguna’s
civic, business and political groups to support a final effort and
the heads of most of the organizations all came to a City Council
meeting to demand some action by the city.
Bill Martin was mayor at the time and was strongly opposed to city
involvement in the project. Confronted with overwhelming evidence
that Laguna’s citizen leadership wanted action, Martin finally said
he would support such an action to the extent of making the city’s
bonding capacity available so we could have a modest interest rate
but the city would put no cash in the pot
The council then appointed a committee of five including Bill
Wilcoxen, Bernie Syfan, Merrill Johnson, me and one other, to
determine how we could fund the land purchase. Wilcoxen and I finally
met with the Festival of Arts Board and asked if they would guarantee
the $133,000 annual bond payment over 30 years. (At that time the
city had not yet negotiated confiscatory leases with the Festival).
The Festival Board agreed to our proposal, which made creation of our
“Window to the Sea” possible. (The Main Beach bond was paid in full
several years ago).
Our next task was to negotiate a purchase deal with the landowner
who unfortunately had a passionate dislike for our city government.
It took a year to get over that hurdle after which we appointed a
select committee of qualified local citizens, particularly Harry
Lawrence who already had years of City Beautification experience, to
design the Main Beach Park.
This was before Village Laguna was in full operation. I do not in
any way, want to denigrate the years of good work Village Laguna has
done for our city. I simply wanted to clarify that particular
misunderstanding.
We hear much these days about Laguna’s Vision Committee. That
large cross section of Laguna’s citizens put in an incredible amount
of time and effort resulting in an exciting plan for Laguna’s
long-range future. I only hope this plan has a better chance of being
implemented than the long-range plan created by another group of
citizen volunteers over 30 years ago.
This committee was an offshoot of the Laguna Chamber of Commerce
although most of the committee’s membership were not members of the
chamber. I was privileged to serve as chairman of the committee which
included such community stalwarts as John Weld, Pete Ostrander, Harry
Lawrence and Muriel Reynolds among others. We met for more than a
year when the city, which had never done any such long-range
planning, expressed an interest in participating in the effort. We
readily agreed and the city appointed Jim Dilley, Bill Wilcoxen and a
number of other top flight community leaders to join our committee.
We first spent time and effort defining just what was the essence
and soul of Laguna that we wanted to preserve. I remember only too
well warning our group that if we did not plan carefully to preserve
our precious diversity we could well become ultimately “Beverly Hills
by the Sea.”
Another facet of our plan involved the “Village Entrance.” We all
agreed the ugly Corporation Yard in the heart of our city was a
disgrace and had to go.
We envisioned a significant four story parking structure against
the steep hillside at the back of the property. The plan called for a
completely landscaped roof incorporating a restaurant similar to
Tivoli Terrace in appearance. The front facade of the structure would
have planters all across the front of each floor with vine type
plants such as Bougainvillea which would totally camouflage the front
face of the structure and create a striking backdrop for the
significant heavily-landscaped cultural center planned to cover the
balance of the property.
What an exciting new heart of Laguna’s Downtown we would now enjoy
if that part of our plan had been implemented. Let us hope for the
best this time around.
VERN SPITALERI
Laguna Beach
One man’s glory is another’s bane
In referring to Harry Lawrence’s letter which appeared last week,
I’d like to make a couple of points.
He refers to the toll road as being an accomplishment. In fact, it
is a colossal flop because so few people use it. So there it sits, an
ugly concrete scar on the greenbelt and other open space.
Also, he states that he was working with Police Chief Bratten to
clean up Laguna. What was accomplished on Main Beach was to get rid
of a jazz club and then gay bar.
In the “beatnik” era that jazz club was a joyous center, which I
will always fondly remember in the late 1950s and sometimes had
concerts by the greats of that time.
I also would like to point out that it was a mistake to have
removed the old houses on the south end of the beach, which could
have been making a lot of money for the city all these years, and
there was a boardwalk then and plenty of beach for all to swim and
sun. What has been accomplished is a big water wasting lawn. However,
I do appreciate the basketball courts, which always seem to be in
use.
By the way, I’m surprised that you didn’t take credit for getting
rid of the “hippies,” or were you no longer working the chief of that
era?
ANDY WING
Laguna Beach
Canyon Courts players put cards on the table
At this week’s council meeting a contingent of Laguna residents
who regularly enjoy the tennis facilities at the courts adjacent to
the Festival grounds presented a petition signed by more than 500
year-round Laguna Beach residents and more than 200 signers who are
nonresident users of the courts, many of whom are summer residents
and regular visitors from all around the world.
The petition asked the city to consider preserving the facility in
the interest of environmental concerns and local Laguna heritage.
Many letters to the editor have appeared previously in the local
papers making the case from both perspectives and need not be
reiterated.
What does need to be addressed, however, is the rebuttal to the
petition put forward by Arts’ Commissioner Pat Kollenda.
Kollenda first of all found it objectionable that there were so
many non-Lagunans among the tennis players. Apparently she thinks
that our parks, recreational facilities and presumably our beaches
should be reserved primarily for locals only. One wonders why this
same philosophy did not guide her decision in encouraging the
awarding of grant money for the “Art in Public Places” campaign in
connection with Treasure Island Park. Over the strenuous objection of
Councilwoman Cheryl Kinsman, Kollenda oversaw the granting of the
lion’s share of the appropriation to non-Laguna resident artists.
The second point Kollenda made was that the courts are the
exclusive domain of a small elite group and that she hasn’t been able
to get on there. In no one’s recollection did anyone present at the
council meeting have any knowledge of Kollenda ever being at the
tennis courts. If she indeed had been, she no doubt would have
received the warm welcome that all players who come there and abide
by the rules of play are accorded.
Her last point was particularly puzzling to me. Kollenda advocated
a multi-purpose building dedicated to the fine arts and crafts at the
site where the courts presently stand. Such an undertaking would
consume vast financial resources well beyond those readily available
in these times of nearly empty public coffers. What is more, the
viability of such a project is dubious at best. Laguna very nearly
lost its world-class museum because of lack of genuine support from
the local community. The museum continues to struggle as evidenced by
the poorly attended masquerade fund-raiser this past weekend. I
attended it in support of Laguna Arts as did other tennis players.
But I don’t think I saw Kollenda there.
TED CALDWELL
Laguna Beach
RUFF says thanks for Easter Brunch
RUFF (Rescuing Unwanted Furry Friends) would like to thank all
those businesses and individuals who supported our 2003 Easter Brunch
at Tivoli Too.
We are delighted that proceeds were up more than 20% from the
previous year because the economic downturn has led to increasing
demand for our services as pets are abandoned or neglected by owners
with financial difficulties.
Special thanks go to June Neptune and Bobby Fader of Tivoli Too;
their staff and the many RUFF volunteers who make the event so
enjoyable.
We are grateful also to American Mobile Music for donating their
services; the many businesses and individuals who contributed items
for auction or supplies for the buffet; and all the attendees who
donated generously in support of needy animals.
Thanks, too, to your newspaper for helping publicize this event.
MARION ANDERSON
RUFF President
Laguna Beach
Tennis tournament was a pleasant success
Having just completed the 46th annual city of Laguna Beach Tennis
Tournament I would like to thank all those who helped me put it on
with barely a hitch.
Thanks to all the players who participated, win or lose
participating is what our game is all about.
The Laguna Beach Recreation Department has been tremendously
helpful in promoting tennis in this community, and particularly this
tournament. A special thanks to Patty Slowsky at the front desk and
Ron Lutz, Recreation Supervisor. Thanks to Gary Glaub for laying out
the entry forms and all the other coaches in town who encouraged
their players to compete. A big thanks to Rick Conkey at the Pacific
Coast Tennis Foundation for extra publicity. Thanks to my husband,
John, for covering for me on the home front.
I look forward to seeing all of you return next year and extend an
open invitation to all players here and in neighboring cities to come
next year to play and enjoy some competitive tennis.
JULIE HEUSSENSTAMM
USPTA Tournament Director
Laguna Beach
Arts education in city is invaluable
Ask anyone what makes Laguna Beach magical and almost always the
community’s support of art, artists and art education is mentioned
first off.
My children are junior members of the Festival of Arts and what a
treasure! Monica Dunham and Mada Leach inspire local children weekly
through creative, hands-on involvement with innovative techniques in
ceramics and mixed media classes. Classes are offered during the year
because these two artists relish in sharing their enthusiasm and
talent with aspiring minds. The Festival of Arts grounds, a Laguna
Beach park, has welcomed the activities as well as Lang Park. This
generosity from the Festival of Arts is greatly appreciated.
Arts education has value in so many areas, aside from the beauty
it creates. Art education teaches people skills, creative thinking,
an awareness of one’s surroundings and others, mediums of expression,
adds enrichment to life and has also been shown to improve test
scores, too.
Thank you Monica, Mada, and the Festival of Arts for providing art
education that truly makes the Laguna Beach community magical for our
family and so many others.
LAURA WELLSFRY
Laguna Beach
Officer should find something better to do
Members of the Laguna Beach Police Department must enjoy a very
exciting existence if they take pride in patrolling the Top of the
Word neighborhood at 5:30 a.m. on a Saturday writing parking tickets
for local residents whose vehicles are parked on the wrong side of
very quiet streets.
Most civilized countries allow parking on either side of
residential streets thus allowing for drivers to exit in the
direction that they wish to go without the hassle of making a
three-point turn.
Congratulations on a job well done. I just hope there were no
rapes, burglaries, drunk drivers or spouse beatings occurring at the
same time in other parts of town, while you were cruising Bern Drive
at 5:30 a.m. with pen and pad in hand.
Any future donations to telemarketers supposedly representing the
Laguna Beach Police Department will be politely informed that all
excess funds are placed in “Vehicle violation account” just in case.
If this letter is published I would expect even more surveillance
on the corner of Bern Drive and Park Avenue from the Laguna Beach
Police Department looking for additional opportunities to generate
funds for the city .
DAVID R.M. WARD
Laguna Beach
The Coastline Pilot is eager to run your letters. If your letter
does not appear, it may be because of space restrictions, and the
letter will likely appear next week. If you would like to submit a
letter, write to us at P.O. Box 248, Laguna Beach, CA 92652; fax us
at 494-8979; or send e-mail to [email protected]. Please
give your name and include your hometown and phone number, for
verification purposes only.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.