Mailbag - June 8, 2000
- Share via
Having been acquainted with Allan Beek, I find it difficult to believe
that he would “rough up” anyone (“Battle of dueling measures heats up,”
June 6). I can understand his frustration caused by the apparent
inaccurate information being disseminated by the signature gatherers for
the rival Traffic Phasing Ordinance Initiative.
There is no excuse for any “incorrect” information to be given by the
signature gatherers to the citizens of Newport Beach.
I remain very upset after reading your article (“Signing up for the
great initiative debate,” May 18). In this article, former Newport Beach
Mayor Clarence Turner is quoted as saying he thinks “it’s quite possible
that people [collecting signatures] may have been saying things that are
incorrect” when gathering signatures for the amended TPO initiative. He
goes on to state that he is “trying to make sure this stopped happening.”
I am very concerned because I was approached by two signature
gatherers at Gelson’s market. They encouraged me to sign the initiative
in order to “stop the expansion of John Wayne Airport.” I was very
surprised. I thought this initiative was about traffic and development,
not stopping the expansion of John Wayne Airport.
It is the responsibility of the initiative’s backers to educate the
signature gatherers they have hired to accurately present their
initiative prior to asking the voters to place their name on the line.
If, as Clarence Turner stated, it is quite possible that voters
received incorrect information, the petition process should start again
with any incorrect statements publicly corrected.
YVONNE HOUSSELS
Corona del Mar
Resident agrees with 17th Street merchants
I’m calling regarding the article, (“Grass-roots group criticizes 17th
Street plan,” June 1), and I am wondering if I was at the same meeting.
The temper of the meeting was not about dumping traffic on residential
streets if we don’t go to six lanes. The temper of the meeting was that
residents and store owners alike do not want a six-lane thoroughfare
going down 17th Street where people will not shop and the three month
construction will ruin our mom-and-pop store atmosphere that we have on
17th Street.
Anyone at the meeting would have heard over and over again that people
want to try bus turnouts, left-turn signals. And the biggest problem is
that the city is not listening, even to its own ad-hoc committee. Its
mind is made up because there are $4 million dollars being dangled in
front of them to do this.
The residents at this meeting agreed with the store owners who do not
want a six-lane thoroughfare down 17th Street. We want to accommodate
ourselves to live here and pay taxes here and we want the city to listen
to us or it’s going to reflect on election day. Unfortunately, we have a
traffic engineer who does not get the gist of the small-town atmosphere
in East Side Costa Mesa.
GAIL PERKINS
Costa Mesa
Costa Mesa should take more time to review budget
I have a case of budget envy (“City Council studies upcoming budget,”
May 24). Now, I’m aware that coveting your neighbor’s budget process is
not something people usually admit to in public, but it’s true.
Sure, I know that my city’s process starts out well with community
objectives, the policy decisions that are out in plain sight for everyone
to see and for staff to be guided by. And, yes, I know that staff’s
proposals for getting and spending money are presented in an accessible
way. Some even say they are attractively packaged.
But the public part of the process comes and goes in a two-week flash.
It starts June 5 when the first budget documents are made available to
the public, and is over June 19 with budget adoption by the council. It
doesn’t give me time to savor the nuances, the hidden meanings, the
mysteries hinted at between the lines.
What goes here, there? Who gets what, when? Why did they do that? What
of the future? Two weeks, with just a no-public-comment study session and
only one public hearing, is not enough time to decide how to get and
spend $80 million.
I’m envious that Newport Beach citizens take a less hurried approach.
They take the time to get to know their budget intimately. They are
introduced to it in May and their council reviews it in sections -- with
public comment -- until their final vote on June 27.
I’d like to have more than just two weeks with Costa Mesa’s budget.
I’d even like the city to put it on the city’s Web site so I can
conveniently explore every nook and cranny of the budget with my home
computer.
Costa Mesa’s process is otherwise good, but too brief. I seek a
process that well-meaning citizens will find rewarding so they will look
forward to critiquing the budget each year instead of just looking the
other way.
As an involved citizen, I must learn what’s under the covers of the
Costa Mesa budget. Borrowing the timing of Newport Beach’s process could
improve my chances of curing budget envy.
TOM EGAN
Costa Mesa
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.